Rotary Melbourne's 45th Meeting of this Rotary year and our 5,035th all time Club meeting, in its one 103rd yearwas an evening conversation with minimal Rotary Melbourne formalities optimising engagement with three impressive expert panellists discussing the concept of social license and its relevance to the transition to renewable energy production.
Chair for the meeting was President Elect Nominee Phil Cornish. The three panellist’s were:
The panel conversation dealt with what our honorary member Dr Alan Finkel AC described as the largest issue facing the energy transition to net zero: social licence.
He said he slept easier knowing social scientists like Dr Sara Bice were working on the issue. Dr Bice has been engaged in researching the stress burden experienced by many people in the large-scale developments occurring.
Mary Barry outlined the enterprise level steps her organisation, Ecocircular was undertaken across a range of fields and endeavours.
The speakers were in fine form and there was a great deal of engagement and energy in question time.
Put simply, social license is the degree of community support for policy driven changes in the way energy is produced, and distributed along with the complexities of creating the necessary production and distribution infrastructure that the transition requires.
The key take-away from the discussion was that while the means to achieve zero carbon emission and complete the transition to renewables are available and technically feasible, by far the biggest impediment is the challenge if securing genuine social license for change.
Gaining Social license requires careful consultation with those in affected communities most effected by the project proposals, being able to define and offer tangible benefits to these communities that help address concerns together with navigating complex regulatory processes that have resulted in part from the politicisation of renewable energy projects. Governments have a central role in driving meaningful projects that bring communities along with them in implementing renewable energy projects.
The conversation between panellists and their response the Q&A touched on the relative cost of available renewable energy options, with wind and solar being the most cost effective, new hydroelectricity projects unlikely to be proposed and nuclear power plants currently being ruled out by legislation and appearing to be most costly and complex to implement potentially of as 15-year timeframe. The attractiveness of Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) was discussed as well, but the panellists pointed out that no developed western economy has implemented successfully electricity generation using SMRs.
We recommend you look at the video recording of the panel conversation by Clicking here
Copies of the PowerPoint overheads panellists used in the conversation can also be viewed BELOW:
1. Prof Dr Alan Finkel AC by clicking HERE.
2. Prof Dr Sara Bice by clicking HERE.
3. Mary Barry by clicking HERE.
Thanks to President Elect Nominee, Philip Cornish for his input to this meeting summary.